I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. 1 fell slightly short of the Linux file-system performance. The 12,3 % reduction in compilation time with BtrFS is a nice improvement but pales compared to the 58,4 % reduction seen with Ext4 on the same hardware doing the same task. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. No such built-in compression support is in Ext4. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. I've used EX4, XFS, EXT4+LVM and now I'm under BTRFS, and I can tell you, TF2, CSGO, Factorio, KSP, etc, all perform the same under all of them. The fourth generation File System of the Ext (Extended) file system family. ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. Each file system has its own advantages and disadvantages. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of subvolumes is nice too, rather than having to partition). The answer is zfs. EXT4. However, to be honest, it’s not the best Linux file system comparing to other Linux file systems. Higher scores are better. Файловая система Ext4 это улучшенная версия Ext3, которая, в свою очередь, не что иное, как переработанная Ext2. . Ext4 fs can read and write to Ext2 or Ext3 file systems, but the Ext4 it is not compatible with Ext2 and Ext3 drivers. The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. 📽️ Abonnez-vous : Devenir membre VIP : et se former à #Linux, voici ce que je vous propose dans cet. Ext4 (Extended File System) Btrfs ( B-tree File System) Lợi ích khi chạy File System Btrfs trên NAS Synology. Btrfs is expected to offer better. , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. Furthermore, the Ext4 is designed to be backward compatible. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. What concerns me is reports that its heavier on ssd's due to all the extra metadata tracking etc. But EXT4 is mature, rock solid, and completely reliable, and the standard for most of the linux world. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. what i found is that ext3 lost around 5-10 files out of every million, XFS around 5-30 per million and both Reiser and JFS went to several hundreds, a thousand lost files in at least one case. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS file systems File systems like ZFS, EXT4, and BTRFS may seem strange or. 00GHz (8 Cores) MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. Btrfs and Ext4 are Linux file systems but are. On a single-drive system, performance wise ext4 is what the user wants. I do use f2fs on all of my Raspberry Pi SD cards where it gives a huge performance boost over btrfs or ext4. I haven't benchmarked the performance but as a user on a modern desktop/laptop system with fast ssd, f2fs vs btrfs didn't show any. Bcachefs is a copy-on-write (COW) file system for Linux-based operating systems. xfs command. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. Ext4 - очень стабильная файловая система, которая была выбрана по. 7 - EXT4 vs. installs, natively. XFS does not require extensive reading. Windows has always been terribly slow to update, say, all file permissions in a large directory structure. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. zfs or btrfs or ext4. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to immediately enter that new. It's not the most cutting-edge file system, but that's good: It means Ext4 is rock-solid and stable. I know how to maintain it even in case of horrible events. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. Rather then using BTRFS, I would use XFS and hope for the best, or using dm-integrity. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Especially things that cause lots of file-internal fragementation like databases. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. This section highlights the differences when using or administering an XFS file system. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. •. BtrFS looked promising, but last I checked it still couldn't be trusted in RAID modes. 7. In Summary, ZFS, by contrast with EXT4, offers nearly unlimited capacity for data and metadata storage. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. And xfs. If you use Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora Workstation, the installer defaults to ext4. . On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Running this fio command, I get about 2. If you omit the size parameter, a journal size based on the size of the file system is used. Thanks. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. . File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. (2013) compared the performance of Btrfs against XFS and ext4. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. Maybe adding Btrfs compression would be negligible outside of storage benchmarks. Ext4 is fast and rock solid, and easily recovered on a desktop machine if things go really bad. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. On multi-drive systems, the opposite might be true, zfs outperforming ext4. Otherwise use BTRFS. Following my post MySQL/ZFS Performance Update, a few people have suggested I should take a look at BTRFS (“butter-FS”, “b-tree FS”) with MySQL. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. The only case where XFS is slower is when creating/deleting a lot of small files. Ext4 was designed with spinning drives in mind but as SSDs are fundamentally different, an SSD optimized file system can help. If you think that you need. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. has built-in support for snapshots - useful for both backups and “testing out” scripts. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. XFS. Ext3 and ext4 have some very specific differences, which I'll focus on here. 1. – cas. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Bcachefs Linux File-System Benchmarks vs. That one is solid and mature. The benchmark results of three most common file systems under Linux environment were given in this paper. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. If you are using Ext2 or Ext3, you can convert the partition to Ext4. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. No compression, but compaction. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Storage Manager Last updated: Apr 18, 2023 Purpose This article compares the different file systems to help you decide which one to choose when creating a. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. XFS. Better for gaming, my money is on ZFS if you have extra RAM to spare and restrict the cache size. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. To organize that data, ZFS uses a flexible tree in which each new system is a child. Btrfs is one of the most popular newly created file systems, and was. . 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). Tweaking the config is easy if you've figured out how to build and load your own kernel. 15 Git kernels. BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. XFS is spectacularly fast during both the insertion phase and the workload execution. Btrfs has been a stable part of the Linux kernel since 2013, and you can reformat your hard drives using the file system today. It's an improved version of the older Ext3 file system. 15 or newer (Please the same OS using same activating services and same apps!)Key Points: ZFS stands for Zettabyte filesystem. 创建 btrfs 文件系统 6. 5. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. " And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. A tool for managing BTRFS and LVM snapshots. 0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see. org. 3. Ext4 比 Btrfs 更穩定嗎？ 儘管在撰寫本文時 Btrfs 缺乏穩定性和. Btrfs Format은 데이터 관리와 안정성을 강화한 파일 시스템으로 파일 관리가 중요한 NAS 시스템에서 가장 적합한 포맷입니다. After conversion I: enabled compression. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. Each of these relies on the backing filesystem being configured correctly. As the load increased, both of the filesystems were limited by the throughput of the underlying hardware, but XFS still maintained its lead. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. The BTRFS RAID is not difficult at all to create or problematic, but up until now, OMV does not support BTRFS RAID creation or management through the webGUI, so you have to use the terminal. In general, Ext3 or Ext4 is better if an application uses a single read/write thread and small files, while XFS shines when an application uses multiple read/write threads and bigger files7. Crypto2. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. BTRFS is a filesystem with an architecture and a set of features that are similar to ZFS and with a GPL license. F2FS vs. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. Indie games often too get fair amount of gain. BtrFS is still very experimental and is not recommended for a production server or desktop environment. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. A backup strategy without data integrity protection from the file system or some other mechanism will blindly backup corrupted data if data corruption occurs. 3. 0 File-System. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. One of the biggest differences between them is that their supported operating system. The arguments about ext4 vs NTFS have been raging online for decades now. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. XFS is more and more mature than Btrfs, but. Why? Files are the most important bits of data on your hard drive. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Depends on what you're looking for. Running this fio command, I get about 2. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. But timeshift reports (maybe due to different sizes of the combined btrfs) as reported in my initial. You can hot swap drives without rebooting, remove failed drives, swap in a larger drive and remove the smaller one, all without preparing ahead of time to do so. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. I see that it says multiple btrfs snapshots are not supported. . Personal data is irreplaceable. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Ext4 is the default filesystem in Manjaro at the moment. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. I used XFS until I managed to corrupt my partition table (my fault not XFS'). We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. It is intended to compete with the modern features of ZFS or Btrfs, and the speed and performance of ext4 or XFS. The XFS File System. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. to add to the confusion: one actually could use btrfs to act like some sort of raid ;-) I would not use btrfs for that anyway. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. All of these Linux. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. EXT2/3/4: Extended Filesystem is by far the most popular filesystem among Linux desktop installations. On lower thread counts, it’s as much as 50% faster than EXT4. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. It is the default file system in RHEL 6, Debian 7, Ubuntu 18 and so on. ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. Having this opportunity I wanted to put some hard numbers to my previous observations regarding ext4 vs Btrfs performance on my T430 running Qubes OS R4. If you are running a more stable system like Dabian based Linux EXT4 is a better choice because it's faster file system but not as easy to revert. OMV4 or OMV5. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. Mar 14, 2012. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. Compression is usually not very efficient on game data (that is already compressed) and can increase fragmentation. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. Btrfs provides checksums for data and metadata, ensuring enhanced data integrity. Delay allocation based on extent for faster file allocations. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. 2. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. Across the three tested RAID modes, EXT4 was performing the worst. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. Ext4 specially without a journal and XFS are both extremely fast. I've read and have anecdotally (not scientific and could be affected by other things) experienced Btrfs being slower than ext4. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently. A. Page 2 of 2. Tùy chọn mặc. Both are good file systems. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. For the Proxmox host, if you install it and use LVM-thin as root pool option in the Proxmox installer, it will automatically make a root partition in EXT4. Since btrfs does not work like a normal partition, but uses volumes and subvolumes per default on fedora, you may see other challenges. As well as ext4. Downside is that it's a slower file system due to it's nature of redundancy. Linux có nhiều tùy chọn hệ thống file khác nhau. ext3 is the most common format. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA. BTRFS. Abstract and Figures. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. 1. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. BTW, transparent compression can offset much of the performance penalty between using a fs like btrfs or ZFS and a more traditional fs like ext4 or xfs, depending on your workload. LVM takes a set of block devices and presents the system with a new (LV) block device with a fixed mapping to physical blocks. It was time to do my quarterly disaster recovery drill, which involves bootstrapping my entire system from scratch using my scripts and backups. now i would do ext4 and btrfs instead of ReiserFS and JFS. NTFS OpenBenchmarking. For BTRFS, the overall throughput is fairly low (~30k tps), while the jitter is somewhat better and worse than for EXT4/XFS at the same time. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. I use ext4 everywhere. The Ext4 File System. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. Recommended for general use. A) crater. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. Although XFS is good, in practice I've found ext4 to be slightly faster. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. Reasons why I use LVM/ext4: I'm used to it. . Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. Ext4 comes up with some new and improved features such as: Extent-based. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. e. EXT4 is better in the general case. Phoronix: Linux 4. provides. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. Share. As for why btrfs on root, well, it offers rollback on updates and. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. Depending on why you want btrfs, you could run zfs. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. 3. Được tích hợp vô hệ thống DSM Synology , do NAS có hiệu xuất làm việc cao trong vấn đề lưu trữ và khôi phục, Btrfs hoạt động trên NAS. ext4 is not recommended. Offizieller Beitrag. While it is possible to migrate from ext4 to XFS, it. Theodore Ts’o, a maintainer for Ext3 and later, Ext4, has stated that he sees Btrfs as a better way forward than continuing to rely on the ext* technology. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. Bảo vệ dữ liệu. Key Btrfs features Perhaps the most important feature is the checksumming of all data. The logical path from Ext4 is to Btrfs. Ext4 Filesystem 其實你提到一個重點了. First up was the SQLite embedded SQL database library test. As cotas XFS não são uma opção remountable. There won't be any noticeable difference. User quotas for each shared folder. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. User quotas for each shared folder. 1. The checking task improved 14,6 %. 2 See what others are saying What is btrfs? Btrfs, which stands for B-tree file system, is a modern and advanced file system that supports many features, such as snapshots, compression,. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. a lot of btrfs' perception of 'breaking' is actually due to checksums (correctly) finding fault on a users data and (correctly) not allowing mounting of the filesystem until it's fixed. I wouldn't go for ZFS on root although it is fully supported on Proxmox 6. Here is a quote from RHEL regarding XFS vs ext4. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. There are results for “single file” with O_DIRECT case (sysbench fileio 16 KiB blocksize random write workload): ext4 1 thread: 87 MiB/sec. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. repeat with all candidate filesystems in my case it was ext3, XFS, ReiserFS and JFS. 88. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. F2FS vs. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. XFS与Ext4性能比较. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. To format an xfs filesystem correctly, use the flag -n ftype=1. This process have two main steps: 1. Files less than ~2KiB can be stored in the metadata section (“inline” in the b-tree nodes), so as not to waste most of a block. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. ZoL Performance, Ubuntu ZFS On Linux Reference Storage : 2019-04-24: Linux 5. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. Have snapper to create pre/post BTRFS and LVM snapshots. 7. that said, current Tumbleweed builds disable COW for those subvolumes. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. Ext4, while. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. Under Compile Bench, EXT4 was the fastest on all three drives followed by a mix of XFS and F2FS. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. org and zfsonlinux. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. EXT4 vs. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). EXT4. Back when Bcachefs debuted in 2015 I ran some initial. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. 7 - Btrfs vs. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. However, XFS is amazingly fast in the insertion phase as well as the workload execution phase. The stock mount options were used for all of the testing. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. I did this to all of my partitions, including home. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. one of the still “beta” features of btrfs. But. Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good thing that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. Both ext4 and XFS should be able to handle it. Btrfs使用校验和来确保数据不会被破坏，另一方面，Ext4不能确保数据的完整性。 Btrfs提供了文件系统中存在的压缩算法，允许在将数据写入系统时在文件系统级进行压缩. Reliable! I used it in Rsync mode as only my backup disk is btrfs, everything else was ext4 or XFS. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits.